Of course, if you start using them extensively, you shall notice the differences.īut, to save you from the trouble, let me highlight the differences here: Installation and Platform Availability Unfortunately, the similarities fade away as you look for various features, user interface, file format compatibility, export capabilities, and other characteristics. LibreOffice and OpenOffice are capable enough to open various file formats that include Microsoft’s DOCX, PPT, and more. Simply put, you can count on both if you require an open-source office suite on Linux, Windows, and macOS. You can use any of them if all you need is to create a basic document, spreadsheet, or presentation without requiring any complex operations or shortcuts to improve productivity. LibreOffice and OpenOffice have a few things in common.
So, LibreOffice was created as a replacement for .īut, now that OpenOffice still exists and is actively maintained, why should you choose LibreOffice? Isn’t OpenOffice good enough? What are the similarities between them? What’s Common in LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice? When Apache started maintaining it, the name of the office suite was tweaked to “OpenOffice” or Apache OpenOffice.ĭuring this transition period, The Document Foundation forked to create LibreOffice, fearing that Oracle would discontinue the project. Later, Oracle acquired Sun Microsystems and eventually ditched while submitting the code base to Apache.
It was introduced as an open-source version of StarOffice (acquired by them initially) to compete with Microsoft Office. Use sci-libs/coinor-mp as alternative solverĪdd support for CUPS (Common Unix Printing System)īuild with user-specified CFLAGS (unsupported)Įnable dbus support for anything that needs it (gpsd, gnomemeeting, etc)Įnable extra debug codepaths, like asserts and extra was a project developed by Sun Microsystems. Add support for accessibility (eg 'at-spi' library)Įnable full support for LibreOffice Base databases (involves additional bundled libs)
0 kommentar(er)
